Sakthisagar
11-08 02:46 PM
Last Action on this bill is May 20th 2009, do anyone know for sure still this bill is active? or recently there is a move to take this bill again?
S. 1085: Reuniting Families Act (GovTrack.us) (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-1085)
S.1085: Reuniting Families Act - U.S. Congress - OpenCongress (http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1085/show)
WashingtonWatch.com - S. 1085, The Reuniting Families Act (http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1085.html)
S. 1085: Reuniting Families Act (GovTrack.us) (http://www.govtrack.us/congress/bill.xpd?bill=s111-1085)
S.1085: Reuniting Families Act - U.S. Congress - OpenCongress (http://www.opencongress.org/bill/111-s1085/show)
WashingtonWatch.com - S. 1085, The Reuniting Families Act (http://www.washingtonwatch.com/bills/show/111_SN_1085.html)
wallpaper house funny puppies. funny
GCwaitforever
06-14 10:12 AM
Backlog Centers
AJB to AJE
In anticipation of America's Job Bank (AJB) ceasing operations as a recruitment tool, the Backlog Elimination Centers (BECs) will be switching to America's Job Exchange (AJE) as an alternative site for posting recruitment advertisements for backlogged Foreign Labor Certification recruitment activity. AJE is one of the alternatives authorized by the Employment and Training Administration (ETA). The BECs have coordinated with AJE staff and we believe this transition will cause little if any disruption. According to the description provided by AJB, "AJE will offer the same national labor exchange services that AJB provided � [using] the same screens and functions as AJB ensuring a seamless transition between sites."
Because AJB is going to stop operations by June 30, 2007, in order to ensure full recruitment periods, the BECs will switch to AJE as of June 1, 2007. Therefore, employers and job seekers will be able to find the job postings on AJE starting on June 1st. Advertisements posted on AJB prior to June 1st will continue on AJB through their full recruitment periods on AJB.
AJE can be found at: http://www.americasjobexchange.com/
AJB to AJE
In anticipation of America's Job Bank (AJB) ceasing operations as a recruitment tool, the Backlog Elimination Centers (BECs) will be switching to America's Job Exchange (AJE) as an alternative site for posting recruitment advertisements for backlogged Foreign Labor Certification recruitment activity. AJE is one of the alternatives authorized by the Employment and Training Administration (ETA). The BECs have coordinated with AJE staff and we believe this transition will cause little if any disruption. According to the description provided by AJB, "AJE will offer the same national labor exchange services that AJB provided � [using] the same screens and functions as AJB ensuring a seamless transition between sites."
Because AJB is going to stop operations by June 30, 2007, in order to ensure full recruitment periods, the BECs will switch to AJE as of June 1, 2007. Therefore, employers and job seekers will be able to find the job postings on AJE starting on June 1st. Advertisements posted on AJB prior to June 1st will continue on AJB through their full recruitment periods on AJB.
AJE can be found at: http://www.americasjobexchange.com/
glus
01-17 05:26 PM
I just contributed $30.
Pleadged $20 monthly.
Contributed so far: $100.00
Glus
Pleadged $20 monthly.
Contributed so far: $100.00
Glus
2011 funny puppies wallpaper. beach
americandesi
07-20 01:44 PM
Did anyone apply for PERM on or after 07/16 to Chicago service center and got it Certified?
more...
franklin
09-20 06:36 PM
as for logiclife...he has had "enough of flowery protests"...i'll leave the rest to your imagination ;)
I am actually very dissappointed with myself. In the post rally MC fluster, I had made a mental note to introduce Logiclife and then give him a flower. But I hear he strongly opposes measures such as this :)
I had also promised to get Macaca on the stage and write with colorful Sharpies on his forehead.
Its probably best I forgot both...
I am actually very dissappointed with myself. In the post rally MC fluster, I had made a mental note to introduce Logiclife and then give him a flower. But I hear he strongly opposes measures such as this :)
I had also promised to get Macaca on the stage and write with colorful Sharpies on his forehead.
Its probably best I forgot both...
smuggymba
05-11 10:13 AM
I would not like to use such words like Leech without knowing the history of a member. It is derogatory.
I am happy that the person joined IV and maybe contributed to it. It is partly our fault that we all did not reach out to such people and convince them enough how they can be a part of the effort. Such members with few posts may be still thinking of IV just as forum for posting their case questions. They may think of IV just like any other tracker site or forum. If it is true then it is also a fault of each one of us because we have not raised the awareness enough. It does not really matter if they post 100 times or 1 time. There are some donors who have less than 10 posts but they have been silent supporters of IV as donors for a long time. They just do not have time to regularly visit IV. But they financially support the effort.
What I do not like are people who do not care about what we do even though they know about IV. Such people maybe having 1000 posts or no posts. They only contact IV when their own case is having problems. Whether it is EAD delays or I485 denial etc. They could be talking against IV all this time and then suddenly expect IV to devote its time and resources to help them. It is the quality of the community that defines who we are and when we come across such people it is shameful. Last year there was a very active member for several years (never contributed a penny but had 100s of posts) who became current. He used to post on approval thread like this one seeing who gets approval. When his anxiety level reached high, he sent me a PM saying he will contribute $25 to IV if IV can help as his case is current and USCIS is not taking action. Such are the incidents we come across and we really wonder if these are the highly educated folks we are fighting for. As I have said, the reason why this backlog still exists is because Immigrants stuck in the backlog are ok with it and do not care about removing it. There is no point blaming the system, if people in the system do not complain against it.
If a person joins IV to declare his GC; it can be assumed that he knows IV exists and it's goals but never bothered to show up earlier till the magical email.
I am happy that the person joined IV and maybe contributed to it. It is partly our fault that we all did not reach out to such people and convince them enough how they can be a part of the effort. Such members with few posts may be still thinking of IV just as forum for posting their case questions. They may think of IV just like any other tracker site or forum. If it is true then it is also a fault of each one of us because we have not raised the awareness enough. It does not really matter if they post 100 times or 1 time. There are some donors who have less than 10 posts but they have been silent supporters of IV as donors for a long time. They just do not have time to regularly visit IV. But they financially support the effort.
What I do not like are people who do not care about what we do even though they know about IV. Such people maybe having 1000 posts or no posts. They only contact IV when their own case is having problems. Whether it is EAD delays or I485 denial etc. They could be talking against IV all this time and then suddenly expect IV to devote its time and resources to help them. It is the quality of the community that defines who we are and when we come across such people it is shameful. Last year there was a very active member for several years (never contributed a penny but had 100s of posts) who became current. He used to post on approval thread like this one seeing who gets approval. When his anxiety level reached high, he sent me a PM saying he will contribute $25 to IV if IV can help as his case is current and USCIS is not taking action. Such are the incidents we come across and we really wonder if these are the highly educated folks we are fighting for. As I have said, the reason why this backlog still exists is because Immigrants stuck in the backlog are ok with it and do not care about removing it. There is no point blaming the system, if people in the system do not complain against it.
If a person joins IV to declare his GC; it can be assumed that he knows IV exists and it's goals but never bothered to show up earlier till the magical email.
more...
apb
07-19 01:19 PM
Also please refer to one more forum/person who has helped you with your BEC
If you anybody other than IV who has taken up your issue voluntarily, let me know.
If you anybody other than IV who has taken up your issue voluntarily, let me know.
2010 funny puppies and dogs.
GCKarma
06-16 04:52 PM
Is it a good sign?:confused:
http://www.brownfieldnetwork.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=D868551C-A6A1-537D-61F3AA4855200F48
Movement on immigration stalled
Thursday, June 15, 2006, 10:56 AM
by Jason Vance
House Speaker Dennis Hastert is backing away from statements made earlier this week suggesting a plan to hold hearings on the Senate�s version of the immigration reform bill.
According to Congressional Quarterly, Hastert says he'll look at that issue, but the first priority is spreading the leadership's message about the Iraq war. Hastert has said he wants to take a long look at the Senate's legislation before naming House conferees.
There are some big differences the conference committee will have to reconcile. The Senate's bill provides a pathway to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants already in the country, and includes a guest-worker program. Neither is included in the House version, which focuses on tightening border security.
The NAFB News Service contributed to this article.
http://www.brownfieldnetwork.com/gestalt/go.cfm?objectid=D868551C-A6A1-537D-61F3AA4855200F48
Movement on immigration stalled
Thursday, June 15, 2006, 10:56 AM
by Jason Vance
House Speaker Dennis Hastert is backing away from statements made earlier this week suggesting a plan to hold hearings on the Senate�s version of the immigration reform bill.
According to Congressional Quarterly, Hastert says he'll look at that issue, but the first priority is spreading the leadership's message about the Iraq war. Hastert has said he wants to take a long look at the Senate's legislation before naming House conferees.
There are some big differences the conference committee will have to reconcile. The Senate's bill provides a pathway to citizenship for millions of illegal immigrants already in the country, and includes a guest-worker program. Neither is included in the House version, which focuses on tightening border security.
The NAFB News Service contributed to this article.
more...
kommisetty
08-14 11:01 AM
Finally I got the email for Renewal EAD card production ordered.
I e-filed on june 9th, sent docs on june 11th and finger printing on July 1st. Card production ordered on Aug 13th and will update with the validity of the period once i receive the EAD card.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PD:10/05 EB2-I. I-140 AP 3/06. I-485 RD 08/07 ND 10/07.
************************************************** ********
If my post has been helpful, please consider contributing to immigrationvoice. It will help us continue this effort and serve the community. Thank you.
************************************************** ********
I e-filed on june 9th, sent docs on june 11th and finger printing on July 1st. Card production ordered on Aug 13th and will update with the validity of the period once i receive the EAD card.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
PD:10/05 EB2-I. I-140 AP 3/06. I-485 RD 08/07 ND 10/07.
************************************************** ********
If my post has been helpful, please consider contributing to immigrationvoice. It will help us continue this effort and serve the community. Thank you.
************************************************** ********
hair cute puppies wallpaper. funny
amirani
05-16 05:48 PM
I had discussion with Mr.Gotcher about this issue. He said, AILA is collecting information on this matter and they are pursuing with Altanta center. But he does not believe or expect any positive outcome. As said earlier he insist to send a formal complaint with OIG and offered his time/help. As its affecting large group of people he refused to accept any fee. I offered we are ready to cover any expense which he might incurr, but seems like it would be very less and he offered free service. Mr.Gotcher will draft a letter in a week time. What we need now - lot support and signature. We do not need to provide any case number. so I dont believe there would be any consequence. So guys please come forward. Spread this news as much as possible and get enough support. Help yourself and get out of this mess.
Thanks.
congr8ts snathan
thanks very much for helping us...please let me know if I can hlep u in anyway to raise the concern
Thanks.
congr8ts snathan
thanks very much for helping us...please let me know if I can hlep u in anyway to raise the concern
more...
rick_rajvanshi
03-19 08:12 PM
USCIS keeps on changing definition of Backlog as per their convenience.
They should clearly tell how many cases in which category and which county are pending.
We don't need complicated Backlog definitions such as below. Just be transparent and give us Black and White figures as to ascertain where some one stands in line. They may have their internal targets but we need to know BACKLOG from our point of view not USCIS production point of view
The new definition in quantifies the backlog by basing the figure on the number of receipts during the previous number of months that corresponds with target cycle time (usually six) and the current pending count for a given application type. This calculated amount can then be used to assess and determine concrete production targets for backlogged application types and the resources necessary to meet those targets. Therefore, backlog is defined as the difference between pending and receipts for the number of months of target cycle time. (Backlog = Pending – Last Six Months’ receipts). This new definition of backlog better reflects the idea that as long as USCIS is processing its receipts within the designated target cycle time, there is no backlog for those applications as the pending count only reflects cases within [USCIS] target cycle time.
[U]Another issue is out of turn issue of GC . Last year hundreds of visas were given away to people from 2005 AND 2006 PD even though people from 2003 and 2004 were left waiting. Just because DOS and USCIS have to clear the 144k visas before 30 Sept does not mean that they 'll issue Green cards to people who entered line much later.
They should clearly tell how many cases in which category and which county are pending.
We don't need complicated Backlog definitions such as below. Just be transparent and give us Black and White figures as to ascertain where some one stands in line. They may have their internal targets but we need to know BACKLOG from our point of view not USCIS production point of view
The new definition in quantifies the backlog by basing the figure on the number of receipts during the previous number of months that corresponds with target cycle time (usually six) and the current pending count for a given application type. This calculated amount can then be used to assess and determine concrete production targets for backlogged application types and the resources necessary to meet those targets. Therefore, backlog is defined as the difference between pending and receipts for the number of months of target cycle time. (Backlog = Pending – Last Six Months’ receipts). This new definition of backlog better reflects the idea that as long as USCIS is processing its receipts within the designated target cycle time, there is no backlog for those applications as the pending count only reflects cases within [USCIS] target cycle time.
[U]Another issue is out of turn issue of GC . Last year hundreds of visas were given away to people from 2005 AND 2006 PD even though people from 2003 and 2004 were left waiting. Just because DOS and USCIS have to clear the 144k visas before 30 Sept does not mean that they 'll issue Green cards to people who entered line much later.
hot cute puppies wallpaper.
kasanski33
11-14 11:06 AM
Sent my passport on Oct 8th got the new one yesterday.
more...
house Funny Puppy Halloween
thess904
05-02 04:40 PM
I hope these delays with atlanta perm will be resolved . It's really frustrating.
I have similar situation with you guys.
Perm filed: April 12, 2007
Audited : Oct. 12, 2007
Audit Reply: Nov. 12, 2007
Category : EB2 (BS+10 years)
Field : Operations Manager
I have similar situation with you guys.
Perm filed: April 12, 2007
Audited : Oct. 12, 2007
Audit Reply: Nov. 12, 2007
Category : EB2 (BS+10 years)
Field : Operations Manager
tattoo Funny Puppy !
maheshf
05-09 08:27 AM
I am current with
PD: June 23, 2006
Used AC21 2 3 years back
Had RFE in 2009. Reuqesting information on my new position (current company)
Opend SR on may 3rd.
Received following reply. I am concerend. Any body inb same boat and what can I expect next?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The status of this service request is:
Based on your request we researched the status of I-485. We are actively processing this case. However, we have to perform additional review on this case and this has caused a longer processing time. Please allow extra time for an Officer to review your application. Furthermore, if all initial evidence was not included with your application or a question arose during adjudication that required a Request For Evidence, additional time would be needed. Your application remains awaiting review by an Officer and you will be notified as soon as a decision is made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PD: June 23, 2006
Used AC21 2 3 years back
Had RFE in 2009. Reuqesting information on my new position (current company)
Opend SR on may 3rd.
Received following reply. I am concerend. Any body inb same boat and what can I expect next?
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
The status of this service request is:
Based on your request we researched the status of I-485. We are actively processing this case. However, we have to perform additional review on this case and this has caused a longer processing time. Please allow extra time for an Officer to review your application. Furthermore, if all initial evidence was not included with your application or a question arose during adjudication that required a Request For Evidence, additional time would be needed. Your application remains awaiting review by an Officer and you will be notified as soon as a decision is made.
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
more...
pictures wallpaper Funny: Puppies vs
maddipati1
07-17 09:20 PM
Hey H1BLegal95, 2 things
1. my friends 04 BEC was approved yesterday. check yours. it might have got approved or will be in few weeks, so prepare ur 485 papers and be ready to file even on Aug16th.
2. u r only losing the ability to get EAD n AP. You will get GC according to ur priroity date.
1. my friends 04 BEC was approved yesterday. check yours. it might have got approved or will be in few weeks, so prepare ur 485 papers and be ready to file even on Aug16th.
2. u r only losing the ability to get EAD n AP. You will get GC according to ur priroity date.
dresses Funny puppy desktop wallpapers
fingerscrossed
05-02 12:41 PM
1) Applied Date - September 2007
2) Audit Date - October 2007
3) Audit Reply Date - November 16 2007
4) Category - EB2
5) Center - Atlanta
2) Audit Date - October 2007
3) Audit Reply Date - November 16 2007
4) Category - EB2
5) Center - Atlanta
more...
makeup free puppy wallpaper
StarSun
02-22 09:06 AM
Guys,
We need your time, your enthusiasm on the advocacy days. IV is a grass roots organization. You are the grass roots.
We face problems of backlogs, and career uncertainty. IV is offering a solution, if implemented, it will bring relief to all. IV needs your help to deliver what you and I "NEED" AND "WANT".
HELP IV HELP YOU.
We need heavy participation on the lobby days, I need volunteers from different states to ask me "How can I help?" instead, I am trying to find volunteers! I have been able to persuade members who have received GCs to help out, but getting members who are still in the mess are either unaware of the advocacy days (in spite of the thread running on the home page for the past month) or are not ready to talk to the employers to take the two days off. Capitol Hill runs on weekdays and therefore it is necessary for you to take the time off.
Come on guys, you can do better than this. Donors, members, guests - we are all in this together!
We need your time, your enthusiasm on the advocacy days. IV is a grass roots organization. You are the grass roots.
We face problems of backlogs, and career uncertainty. IV is offering a solution, if implemented, it will bring relief to all. IV needs your help to deliver what you and I "NEED" AND "WANT".
HELP IV HELP YOU.
We need heavy participation on the lobby days, I need volunteers from different states to ask me "How can I help?" instead, I am trying to find volunteers! I have been able to persuade members who have received GCs to help out, but getting members who are still in the mess are either unaware of the advocacy days (in spite of the thread running on the home page for the past month) or are not ready to talk to the employers to take the two days off. Capitol Hill runs on weekdays and therefore it is necessary for you to take the time off.
Come on guys, you can do better than this. Donors, members, guests - we are all in this together!
girlfriend funny dogs and puppies
krishnam70
07-11 09:07 PM
http://www.usimmlaw.com/current_information.htm
Posted July 11, 2007
Visa numbers WERE available July 2nd!!
We have confirmed with a knowledgeable official in the Department of State Visa Office that USCIS was requesting visa numbers on Sunday July 1st, and Monday morning July 2nd - and that visa numbers were still being issued as late as the morning of July 2nd!
In fact, close to 30,000 visa numbers were requested and issued in July - through the morning of July 2nd. And we believe that many - if not most - of the requests made in the first two days of July were for applicants whose priority dates were not current in June!
So how can USCIS refuse to accept I-485 filings received BEFORE the State Department issued its notice that all visa numbers had been used???? We have not yet confirmed the return of any I-485s filed in July. But we do know that applications were reaching the USCIS before the State Department announcement - and while the USCIS was frantically working to use up the entire year's allocation.
USCIS did not use all visa numbers before July 2nd.
Did USCIS actually use the visa numbers it requested????
Historically, the USCIS doesn't request a visa number from the Department of State until it is ready to grant the adjustment of status application. US Consuls overseas request visa numbers the month before they intend to issue the immigrant visa. This is the reason why consuls return about ten percent of the visa numbers requested - and why USCIS does not generally return any numbers.
In fact, in making allocations of visa numbers, the Department of State factors in an expected return rate for consuls - but not for the USCIS. And the USCIS - before this June - used about 85% of the total immigrant visa numbers available.
However, already this month, the USCIS has been returning visa numbers. This confirms our earlier suspicion that the only way the USCIS could request 68,000 visa numbers in a matter of weeks was to request them in advance of adjudicating cases.
We believe USCIS exhausted the visa numbers by simply requesting them - not by using them. If so, and for reasons we will post shortly, we believe that over 30,000 visa numbers requested by USCIS will go unused - and will be wasted this year!
Posted July 9, 2007
Is this because of the strong condemnation from the US congress women Ms Lof that prompted it to do this to cover their tracks? Did some people miss their chance because of this?
Posted July 11, 2007
Visa numbers WERE available July 2nd!!
We have confirmed with a knowledgeable official in the Department of State Visa Office that USCIS was requesting visa numbers on Sunday July 1st, and Monday morning July 2nd - and that visa numbers were still being issued as late as the morning of July 2nd!
In fact, close to 30,000 visa numbers were requested and issued in July - through the morning of July 2nd. And we believe that many - if not most - of the requests made in the first two days of July were for applicants whose priority dates were not current in June!
So how can USCIS refuse to accept I-485 filings received BEFORE the State Department issued its notice that all visa numbers had been used???? We have not yet confirmed the return of any I-485s filed in July. But we do know that applications were reaching the USCIS before the State Department announcement - and while the USCIS was frantically working to use up the entire year's allocation.
USCIS did not use all visa numbers before July 2nd.
Did USCIS actually use the visa numbers it requested????
Historically, the USCIS doesn't request a visa number from the Department of State until it is ready to grant the adjustment of status application. US Consuls overseas request visa numbers the month before they intend to issue the immigrant visa. This is the reason why consuls return about ten percent of the visa numbers requested - and why USCIS does not generally return any numbers.
In fact, in making allocations of visa numbers, the Department of State factors in an expected return rate for consuls - but not for the USCIS. And the USCIS - before this June - used about 85% of the total immigrant visa numbers available.
However, already this month, the USCIS has been returning visa numbers. This confirms our earlier suspicion that the only way the USCIS could request 68,000 visa numbers in a matter of weeks was to request them in advance of adjudicating cases.
We believe USCIS exhausted the visa numbers by simply requesting them - not by using them. If so, and for reasons we will post shortly, we believe that over 30,000 visa numbers requested by USCIS will go unused - and will be wasted this year!
Posted July 9, 2007
Is this because of the strong condemnation from the US congress women Ms Lof that prompted it to do this to cover their tracks? Did some people miss their chance because of this?
hairstyles Cute Puppy Wallpapers
gc_on_demand
04-08 02:50 PM
With Limited visa numbers and now USCIS has improve efficiency they will process more and mroe Eb2 ROW and Eb1 application and less spill over to Eb2 India / China.
May be Eb2 india and China will clear 6 months in a given year.
Eb2 india by
2010 It may reach 2005
2011 It may reach Mid 2005
2011 It may reach 2006
2011 It may reach Mid 2006 and this continues....
May be Eb2 india and China will clear 6 months in a given year.
Eb2 india by
2010 It may reach 2005
2011 It may reach Mid 2005
2011 It may reach 2006
2011 It may reach Mid 2006 and this continues....
barsha
06-29 01:26 PM
I have a BC which is issued on 2004. Do I still need 2 affidivits? My Lawyer didn't ask me to gather affidivits. Any thoughts on that?
Did anybody filing through FDBL? Any idea how long they are taking to file once they have all the documents and papers?
Thanks!
Did anybody filing through FDBL? Any idea how long they are taking to file once they have all the documents and papers?
Thanks!
goosetavo
03-29 02:18 PM
Looks like Advicacy Days ia happening just in time!