bharani
10-02 10:57 AM
IMHO If you have money save it for future payments(atleast a year's payments). If you lose job, this money will help make your payments.
wallpaper fast and furious fast five
sri1309
07-06 06:30 AM
Search immigration.com ("i-140 denied, urgent help please"). I went thru this, attorney was so-so, not experienced in handling cases like this as he is a small firm. So I went to one of the BIG firms and got it MTR'd and cleared in 3 weeks. I spent 3K, but never thought about it before or after.
While you work on backup options, dont just let go the current status that you got in 4-6 yrs.
The new attorney could easily make up for the pay.
Sri.
While you work on backup options, dont just let go the current status that you got in 4-6 yrs.
The new attorney could easily make up for the pay.
Sri.
plm
08-29 09:06 AM
Thanks for the response. Did you use 3.5cm x 3.5cm?
My wife got passport renewed last week formHouston and we used 2 inch X 2 inch standard photographs (5 cm x 5 cm).
All the best
My wife got passport renewed last week formHouston and we used 2 inch X 2 inch standard photographs (5 cm x 5 cm).
All the best
2011 as Fast amp; Furious Cars at
franklin
08-24 06:37 PM
So I assume your PD need NOT be current to get FP notice?
Correct - Assuming that your PD was current when you filled AOS, of course. If PD then retrogresses, I'm fairly certain you will still get the FP notice.
As I understand it, your AOS application continues all the way up until final approval - at this point if your PD is still retrogressed it goes to a "approved pending visa number availability" state. They do not put it on hold just because your PD retrogresses.
Correct - Assuming that your PD was current when you filled AOS, of course. If PD then retrogresses, I'm fairly certain you will still get the FP notice.
As I understand it, your AOS application continues all the way up until final approval - at this point if your PD is still retrogressed it goes to a "approved pending visa number availability" state. They do not put it on hold just because your PD retrogresses.
more...
singhsa3
04-27 02:51 PM
Good resources on the Interim Policy
http://www.shusterman.com/pdf/ailf-ead.pdf
See page 3
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ElimI688B_081806R.pdf
Another one
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eadpbl.html
http://www.shusterman.com/pdf/ailf-ead.pdf
See page 3
http://www.uscis.gov/files/pressrelease/ElimI688B_081806R.pdf
Another one
http://www.murthy.com/news/n_eadpbl.html
GC7279
05-30 10:18 PM
hi gcnirvana,
i was there in that situation. it was scary.
1. firstentry to usa i got i-94 until: nov 2002
2. extention i-797: nov 2002 to nov 2005. i sent for visastamping in usa june 2003 but mistakenly they gave visa until nov 2004. i went to india and came back to usa on mar 2004. at POE officer gave me I-94 until nov 2004 though my i-797 till nov 2005. i told to my company about my i-94 is expiring 1 year before than my i-797. they have half knowledge and they say it is fine since i have i-797 until nov 2005. i also felt that is reasonable and take it easy.
one fine day(april 2005) i was going through forum then i realised the most recent I-94 is valid than any other document but by the time i realised it, my I-94 expired on nov 2004. i called Murthy she said i am out status because my i-94 expired though my I-797 valid until nov 2005.
she suggested me to go to nearest POE and tell them they gave you wrong expire date and show them I-797.
I went to Minneapolis airport spoke to CBP officer he checked my i-797 and corrected my i I-94 to NOv 2005.
after that i got 2 more I-797s.
i suggest you to go nearest internation airport and contact CBP officer. tell them that they gave you wrong i-94 expire date and show new i-797
i was there in that situation. it was scary.
1. firstentry to usa i got i-94 until: nov 2002
2. extention i-797: nov 2002 to nov 2005. i sent for visastamping in usa june 2003 but mistakenly they gave visa until nov 2004. i went to india and came back to usa on mar 2004. at POE officer gave me I-94 until nov 2004 though my i-797 till nov 2005. i told to my company about my i-94 is expiring 1 year before than my i-797. they have half knowledge and they say it is fine since i have i-797 until nov 2005. i also felt that is reasonable and take it easy.
one fine day(april 2005) i was going through forum then i realised the most recent I-94 is valid than any other document but by the time i realised it, my I-94 expired on nov 2004. i called Murthy she said i am out status because my i-94 expired though my I-797 valid until nov 2005.
she suggested me to go to nearest POE and tell them they gave you wrong expire date and show them I-797.
I went to Minneapolis airport spoke to CBP officer he checked my i-797 and corrected my i I-94 to NOv 2005.
after that i got 2 more I-797s.
i suggest you to go nearest internation airport and contact CBP officer. tell them that they gave you wrong i-94 expire date and show new i-797
more...
aarbi
07-13 12:23 PM
This is something that's doable without legislation. It would be done for employment based visas.
I've been reading the posts all day since yesterday. The most plausible "PERMANENT SOLUTION" has to be this. Please read the msg from IV
1. No change in July bulletin
2. No change in August bulletin
3. Well in that case it has to be this. It would be least controversial.
This however would be a good solution for the over-subscribed countries, and bad news for the other countries...
I've been reading the posts all day since yesterday. The most plausible "PERMANENT SOLUTION" has to be this. Please read the msg from IV
1. No change in July bulletin
2. No change in August bulletin
3. Well in that case it has to be this. It would be least controversial.
This however would be a good solution for the over-subscribed countries, and bad news for the other countries...
2010 About “Fast amp; Furious”:
_thumb%255B1%255D.jpg "2 fast 2 furious cars")
desi3933
03-18 12:16 PM
Thanks for the link...Before this post i was with one green dot now with 8 red dots....thanks all those ass holes.
:cool:
You are incorrect about out of status when person loses job on EAD.
As long as I-485 is pending, person is in valid status. Infact, one may chose do nothing while I-485 is pending as long as he has valid job offer that starts after I-485 approval.
_____________________
Not a legal advice.
:cool:
You are incorrect about out of status when person loses job on EAD.
As long as I-485 is pending, person is in valid status. Infact, one may chose do nothing while I-485 is pending as long as he has valid job offer that starts after I-485 approval.
_____________________
Not a legal advice.
more...
sachya
08-20 01:16 PM
My friends chq got encashed. He is a July 2nd filer for TSC.
Did he file 485 at NCS and then got transferred to TCS or it was filed at TSC itself?
Did he file 485 at NCS and then got transferred to TCS or it was filed at TSC itself?
hair Fast amp; Furious Cars
LostInGCProcess
09-16 02:53 PM
Quoting INA Sec. 212(a)(6)(C)(i); 8 U.S.C. 1182
(i) In general.-Any alien who, by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United States or other benefit provided under this Act is inadmissible.
You can petition for waiver:
Quoting INA Sec. 212(6)(i)
(i) Admission of immigrant inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation of material fact
(1) The Attorney General may, in the discretion of the Attorney General, waive the application of clause (i) of subsection (a)(6)(C) of this section in the case of an immigrant who is the spouse, son, or daughter of a United States citizen or of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if it is established to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that the refusal of admission to the United States of such immigrant alien would result in extreme hardship to the citizen or lawfully resident spouse or parent of such an alien or, in the case of an alien granted classification under clause (iii) or (iv) of section 1154 (a)(1)(A) of this title or clause (ii) or (iii) of section 1154 (a)(1)(B) of this title, the alien demonstrates extreme hardship to the alien or the alien�s United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or qualified alien parent or child.
(2) No court shall have jurisdiction to review a decision or action of the Attorney General regarding a waiver under paragraph (1).
You must talk to an experienced Immigration attorney as its dealing with misrepresentation.
Good Luck!
(i) In general.-Any alien who, by fraud or willfully misrepresenting a material fact, seeks to procure (or has sought to procure or has procured) a visa, other documentation, or admission into the United States or other benefit provided under this Act is inadmissible.
You can petition for waiver:
Quoting INA Sec. 212(6)(i)
(i) Admission of immigrant inadmissible for fraud or willful misrepresentation of material fact
(1) The Attorney General may, in the discretion of the Attorney General, waive the application of clause (i) of subsection (a)(6)(C) of this section in the case of an immigrant who is the spouse, son, or daughter of a United States citizen or of an alien lawfully admitted for permanent residence if it is established to the satisfaction of the Attorney General that the refusal of admission to the United States of such immigrant alien would result in extreme hardship to the citizen or lawfully resident spouse or parent of such an alien or, in the case of an alien granted classification under clause (iii) or (iv) of section 1154 (a)(1)(A) of this title or clause (ii) or (iii) of section 1154 (a)(1)(B) of this title, the alien demonstrates extreme hardship to the alien or the alien�s United States citizen, lawful permanent resident, or qualified alien parent or child.
(2) No court shall have jurisdiction to review a decision or action of the Attorney General regarding a waiver under paragraph (1).
You must talk to an experienced Immigration attorney as its dealing with misrepresentation.
Good Luck!
more...
gcseeker2002
09-16 03:16 PM
<quote>"Just as an Example we LOST 32,000 This year, just in Lawyer fees for H1b's not selected in the lottery."</quote>
$32000 in lawyer fees ? How may H1s were that for ? 50 ? 100 ?
$32000 in lawyer fees ? How may H1s were that for ? 50 ? 100 ?
hot Fast and Furious cars,
return_to_india
02-08 08:08 PM
Hello guys,
......................
4. PIO card has the passport number of my son on it...the passport will expire when he is five year old. So do I get a new passport number? If so what happens to the PIO card? Do I need to get a new one?
.............
Thanks
Yes, a new passport ( from one of the US embassies in India). I don't think it is a new PIO card, but the new passport number will be 'annotated' in the Passport ( Indian embassies in US charge $20 for that ).
......................
4. PIO card has the passport number of my son on it...the passport will expire when he is five year old. So do I get a new passport number? If so what happens to the PIO card? Do I need to get a new one?
.............
Thanks
Yes, a new passport ( from one of the US embassies in India). I don't think it is a new PIO card, but the new passport number will be 'annotated' in the Passport ( Indian embassies in US charge $20 for that ).
more...
house Fast and Furious fast cars
desi3933
06-25 03:30 PM
I double checked with my attorney , either or AP or EAD usage will change your status, ie H1 is no more valid.
http://www.immigrationportal.com/archive/index.php/t-215457.html
http://www.immigrationportal.com/archive/index.php/t-215457.html
tattoo Fast and furious cars car
psgprasad
03-28 02:08 PM
Dear Michigan Members,
This mail is to update you guys on the outcome of meeting with Staff Assistant of Senator Carl Levin (Michigan) and members of Immigration voice namely
Gajendra Prasad
Stanley Samuel
Manoj kumar
We emphasized the following points
1. We are not talking about H1 increase.
2. Reverse Brain drain impacts.
3. Outsourcing economies gaining edge because of Americas poor legal immigration policies.
4. Delays in normal processing.
5. Impact of Backlogs on America competitiveness.
6. Impact of Backlogs on immigrations careers and their contribution to the industry.
7. Details of Presidents State of union Address for legal immigrants.
8. Statistical details which have shown immigration does not affect Americas growth but helps growth of America.
9. Requests of immigration voice.
We quoted our personal life experience and the hindrances we encounter in our career growth.
I have to say the points were observered with a positive note. and the staff said that these will be conveyed to the Senator.
He also suggested, to contact the media, which we are doing and also told,
he was also aware of immigration voice and its good doings.
He also told the Senator voted in favour of CIR 2006.
He suggested having a direct meeting with Senator would definetly help, as it would have a better impact, but he said that it would be easy to get an appointment of the Senator in DC. At this point, we have requested the immigration voice DC members whether they can have an meeting with the Senator and we can arrange the same with this staff member.
He also requested, if any of our member are meeting with the same Senator office staff in different location(Detroit, Grand Rapids,Escabana etc), please refer this staff name for continuity reasons.
Andy Hickner-Staff Assistant of Senator Carl Levin (Michigan) -Lansing office and this meeting.
I will be sending a Thank you letter soon to this Staff.
We are waiting on Appointment from the following office as we have already faxed the request for appointments, after our initial telephonic request.
1. Senator Debie Stabenow - Michigan.
2. Congress Man Mike Rogers - Michigan 8th District.
3. Congress Man Tim Walberg - Michigan 7th District.
Actions Items.
1. Update Michigan members on the meeting and Request them to refer to our discussion, if they meet the same senators office staff in any other offices.
2. Contact Michigan Public Radio for an interview on our issue.
3. Contact Lansing State Journal for an article on our issue.
4. Follow up on other Law makers.
Thanks
Gajendra Prasad Sankaranarayana
This mail is to update you guys on the outcome of meeting with Staff Assistant of Senator Carl Levin (Michigan) and members of Immigration voice namely
Gajendra Prasad
Stanley Samuel
Manoj kumar
We emphasized the following points
1. We are not talking about H1 increase.
2. Reverse Brain drain impacts.
3. Outsourcing economies gaining edge because of Americas poor legal immigration policies.
4. Delays in normal processing.
5. Impact of Backlogs on America competitiveness.
6. Impact of Backlogs on immigrations careers and their contribution to the industry.
7. Details of Presidents State of union Address for legal immigrants.
8. Statistical details which have shown immigration does not affect Americas growth but helps growth of America.
9. Requests of immigration voice.
We quoted our personal life experience and the hindrances we encounter in our career growth.
I have to say the points were observered with a positive note. and the staff said that these will be conveyed to the Senator.
He also suggested, to contact the media, which we are doing and also told,
he was also aware of immigration voice and its good doings.
He also told the Senator voted in favour of CIR 2006.
He suggested having a direct meeting with Senator would definetly help, as it would have a better impact, but he said that it would be easy to get an appointment of the Senator in DC. At this point, we have requested the immigration voice DC members whether they can have an meeting with the Senator and we can arrange the same with this staff member.
He also requested, if any of our member are meeting with the same Senator office staff in different location(Detroit, Grand Rapids,Escabana etc), please refer this staff name for continuity reasons.
Andy Hickner-Staff Assistant of Senator Carl Levin (Michigan) -Lansing office and this meeting.
I will be sending a Thank you letter soon to this Staff.
We are waiting on Appointment from the following office as we have already faxed the request for appointments, after our initial telephonic request.
1. Senator Debie Stabenow - Michigan.
2. Congress Man Mike Rogers - Michigan 8th District.
3. Congress Man Tim Walberg - Michigan 7th District.
Actions Items.
1. Update Michigan members on the meeting and Request them to refer to our discussion, if they meet the same senators office staff in any other offices.
2. Contact Michigan Public Radio for an interview on our issue.
3. Contact Lansing State Journal for an article on our issue.
4. Follow up on other Law makers.
Thanks
Gajendra Prasad Sankaranarayana
more...
pictures Fast amp; Furious FIG Screenshot
caydee
03-07 03:21 PM
No, there is old Child Protection Act and it protects from aging out while I-140 is in process. So child age is determined as age on time of filing I-485 (that means that visa is immediately available) minus time that I-140 was pending with USCIS.
I did not understand the "time of filing I-485 (that means that visa is immediately available) minus time that I-140 was pending with USCIS" part.
My situation is as follows - My I-140 is approved and judging by the current situation my child will be above 21years (currently on H4) when visa becomes available.
My questions are - Will I be able to extend my child's H4 beyond his 21 years, assuming I continue on H1? And will I be able to adjust my child's status when visa becomes available?
Thanks
I did not understand the "time of filing I-485 (that means that visa is immediately available) minus time that I-140 was pending with USCIS" part.
My situation is as follows - My I-140 is approved and judging by the current situation my child will be above 21years (currently on H4) when visa becomes available.
My questions are - Will I be able to extend my child's H4 beyond his 21 years, assuming I continue on H1? And will I be able to adjust my child's status when visa becomes available?
Thanks
dresses scale Fast and Furious 3
gsc999
05-29 11:29 AM
[QUOTE=beppenyc]The problem in French is different. They bring the immigrants from Africa and North Africa to work to build the subway, La Defense (ask yourfriends),Eurostar ect ect. French has a controll of the number of immigrants, is not so difficult. The problem is that they put the immigrants living in the ghetto (Banlieu) and to not give any hope of future. When all the big project were done, they forced to sent the immigrants home, but without success. If you are really interest to see what is the reality in France, get this movie made in 1997, LA HAINE....
Yes, this is not a linear equation that illegals take American jobs and Amecans do not take menial jobs because of lower pay. If Americans were ever to take such jobs, and pays were higher, it would add to inflation, as beppenyc correctly points out. You have to be able to think strategically to understand this.
Now this issue about fairness for the legal immigrants. Normal wait time for this process is 5 to 6 years, if you are lucky. Which means that lives of such people are on "hold." They can't be promoted, accept salary increases. This is "tacit" exploitation. 5 to 6 years is a long time in US where things are more dynamic. How unfair. Also, per the law any social security they contribute will never be credited back to them because they have to work for atleast 10 years, the work visa duration is six year. Skilled workers make reasonable salaries so this is a huge amount of money which thay might never see.
Perceptions maybe far removed from reality. One of them is that immigrants will continue to bear injustice in US while globalization takes its toll on US competitiveness because of populist measures, that will hurt it in the long run.
Yes, this is not a linear equation that illegals take American jobs and Amecans do not take menial jobs because of lower pay. If Americans were ever to take such jobs, and pays were higher, it would add to inflation, as beppenyc correctly points out. You have to be able to think strategically to understand this.
Now this issue about fairness for the legal immigrants. Normal wait time for this process is 5 to 6 years, if you are lucky. Which means that lives of such people are on "hold." They can't be promoted, accept salary increases. This is "tacit" exploitation. 5 to 6 years is a long time in US where things are more dynamic. How unfair. Also, per the law any social security they contribute will never be credited back to them because they have to work for atleast 10 years, the work visa duration is six year. Skilled workers make reasonable salaries so this is a huge amount of money which thay might never see.
Perceptions maybe far removed from reality. One of them is that immigrants will continue to bear injustice in US while globalization takes its toll on US competitiveness because of populist measures, that will hurt it in the long run.
more...
makeup Fast amp; Furious Event Shot
eager_immi
01-25 01:21 PM
I have made a contribution of 300 and another $20 re-curring monthly contribution since jan 07. Now you get my point, the spreadsheet would help u get that information without asking me for it.
To start off with inspiring 'others', maybe you should note in your signature IF you have made a recurring donation, as a lot of other members have done.
I am sure that should work with people who can get 'inspired'. I dont think we need to worry about the others, since they will not contribute anyways.
To start off with inspiring 'others', maybe you should note in your signature IF you have made a recurring donation, as a lot of other members have done.
I am sure that should work with people who can get 'inspired'. I dont think we need to worry about the others, since they will not contribute anyways.
girlfriend Fast amp; Furious Movie Cars
sbind_77
10-25 12:49 PM
chintainfogc
Did you got any reply for your SR?
Did you got any reply for your SR?
hairstyles Fast amp; Furious 4: Car Porn,
arnet
07-05 04:38 PM
there are few famous talk show hosts in KABC radio (Southern california), atleast 5 of them, who have larger listeners and they have devoted one hour everyday regd immigration issues (until they kill this CIR bill because they dont like amnesty issue), they do usually their programs from morning 8am and 5pm-11pm, so I request IV core team to contact their producers using their 1-800 numbers and explain the other side of story i.e. documented workers and how they suffer and what relief this bill can provide us.
for more details, please visit:
http://www.kabc.com/home.asp
IV core team: please contact Rush Limbaugh's talk show host, he has atleast a million listeners.
Thanks.:)
for more details, please visit:
http://www.kabc.com/home.asp
IV core team: please contact Rush Limbaugh's talk show host, he has atleast a million listeners.
Thanks.:)
nomi
12-11 02:17 PM
Originally Posted by god_bless_you
SO if USCIS wants to make a new rule of filing I485 for the one whose I 140 is cleared and priority date is not current, It CAN DO That RULE Right?
We do not need any Congress approval for that Right?
If so can we explore this option??
I agree with you. Why we don`t explore this option ???? USCIS make so many rule by itself then why they don`t make this rule to file 485 while PD is not current without going in Senate. Like they start premium processing of I-140. They make this rule without any bill in US Senate. correct me if I am wrong
I think, core team should look this option or ask us to find more information about it. I think, core team can meet with high official from USCIS.
what do you guys think about it ??
thx.
SO if USCIS wants to make a new rule of filing I485 for the one whose I 140 is cleared and priority date is not current, It CAN DO That RULE Right?
We do not need any Congress approval for that Right?
If so can we explore this option??
I agree with you. Why we don`t explore this option ???? USCIS make so many rule by itself then why they don`t make this rule to file 485 while PD is not current without going in Senate. Like they start premium processing of I-140. They make this rule without any bill in US Senate. correct me if I am wrong
I think, core team should look this option or ask us to find more information about it. I think, core team can meet with high official from USCIS.
what do you guys think about it ??
thx.
cooler
05-23 08:34 AM
I have some good news and some bad news!
The bad news is that. You will get your green card in 5 years and after other five years you will get your citizenship. So in 10 years will be in position to get married.
Now , you will be wondering what is the good news.
Well!, I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance by switiching to GEICO.:D
Really Funny
The bad news is that. You will get your green card in 5 years and after other five years you will get your citizenship. So in 10 years will be in position to get married.
Now , you will be wondering what is the good news.
Well!, I just saved a bunch of money on my car insurance by switiching to GEICO.:D
Really Funny