sjhugoose
February 4th, 2004, 08:09 PM
The failure of the D2H to be even remotely competitive with the 1D Mk 11 even though both cameras had similar development cycles is simply a embarrassment.
But Pope I thought 4 MP is all PJ's want ;)
But Pope I thought 4 MP is all PJ's want ;)
wallpaper al pacino wallpaper - 86536
srikondoji
06-18 07:06 PM
franklin,sroym
I never said that you did not donate. Please re-read my post.
I agree with all of your points and i think we should be carefull in our posts.
I think, the moderators should remind the posters every now and then and also edit posts to appeal to members of all nationalities
Thanks
sri
I never said that you did not donate. Please re-read my post.
I agree with all of your points and i think we should be carefull in our posts.
I think, the moderators should remind the posters every now and then and also edit posts to appeal to members of all nationalities
Thanks
sri
axp817
03-17 05:44 PM
Thanks for the reply.
- A person is on his 5th Year of H1 and his I-485 gets rejected - he can go back to H1 (Since he has 1 year left).
- A person has exhausted his 6 years (May be in his 7th year). Now his I-485 gets rejected - he cannot go back to H1 (Since he has exhausted his 6 years on H1).
Not sure if my understanding is right here
That is correct, scenario 1, atleast to me, seems like a smarter choice, and that is what I have chosen to do.
You can go back on the H-1B if your 485 were to get denied and your appeals (assuming you made any) were to fail, although I am not sure if you need to leave the country and re-enter or if you can adjust status to H-1B without leaving the country.
- A person is on his 5th Year of H1 and his I-485 gets rejected - he can go back to H1 (Since he has 1 year left).
- A person has exhausted his 6 years (May be in his 7th year). Now his I-485 gets rejected - he cannot go back to H1 (Since he has exhausted his 6 years on H1).
Not sure if my understanding is right here
That is correct, scenario 1, atleast to me, seems like a smarter choice, and that is what I have chosen to do.
You can go back on the H-1B if your 485 were to get denied and your appeals (assuming you made any) were to fail, although I am not sure if you need to leave the country and re-enter or if you can adjust status to H-1B without leaving the country.
2011 Al pacino films quot;un
h1techSlave
04-07 11:04 AM
My suggestion is that we write to the senators and to the USCIS chief.
Good Points. I also brought this up in one of the threads earlier. What are we going to do to atleast make sure, Visa numbers dont go waste this year as well.
Good Points. I also brought this up in one of the threads earlier. What are we going to do to atleast make sure, Visa numbers dont go waste this year as well.
more...
pani_6
11-28 05:23 PM
I think it was Collin Powell that help passed the 7th year extension and one year extensions there on if LC is pending for a year..this was passed since there was a crisis with delay in LC adjudications....so we are at a point that we need such a relief soon...we are heading towards such a crisis point..soon...EB releif should happen soon...I think this was a single issue that was handled and relief provided and EB matters should be handled in a piece meal manner....(I may be wrong may be it was a part of AC21)...also oppenents are saying why piece meal handle when CIR is in place to delay any kind of a relief..
Some of us here are under the grand illusion that
(a) the lawmakes consider relief for skilled immigrants in isolation to be an important enough issue that they will make it a priority
(b) Relief for EB immigrants is totally non-controversial and everybody and his brother will back us.
Both assumptions are dead wrong. If 900 of the biggest companies and universities in america cannot convince congress to make SKIL bill a priority, then you know what a formidable challenge lies ahead of us.
As for EB relief being non-controvesial, I only need give one counter-example : S 1932.
We are all desperate for any relief : I repeat ANY. To think that the core team would be so shortsighted as to only pursue grandiose bills like CIR and not be on the look out for smaller relief measures is naive and severely underestimating their intelligence.
Some of us here are under the grand illusion that
(a) the lawmakes consider relief for skilled immigrants in isolation to be an important enough issue that they will make it a priority
(b) Relief for EB immigrants is totally non-controversial and everybody and his brother will back us.
Both assumptions are dead wrong. If 900 of the biggest companies and universities in america cannot convince congress to make SKIL bill a priority, then you know what a formidable challenge lies ahead of us.
As for EB relief being non-controvesial, I only need give one counter-example : S 1932.
We are all desperate for any relief : I repeat ANY. To think that the core team would be so shortsighted as to only pursue grandiose bills like CIR and not be on the look out for smaller relief measures is naive and severely underestimating their intelligence.
gjoe
02-11 10:15 AM
Well, you have not pissed me at all. I did what IV had asked in one month back. I had sent my 2 letters (me and my wife) 17 days back and collected another 12 letters from friends and send them too. I had contributed what ever IV had asked until now, what ever it may be.
I am sorry, but just a note can baffle you guys and you put all the -ve comments to the post, then sorry to say you guys cannot take any constructive opinion from others. And I think I did no wrong in asking Chanduv to stop posting innumerable threads just for one cause.
GOD Bless you all.
I support Sanjay and Chanduv. Need balance in a democracy, so folks we got to walk the fine line in the middle.
I am sorry, but just a note can baffle you guys and you put all the -ve comments to the post, then sorry to say you guys cannot take any constructive opinion from others. And I think I did no wrong in asking Chanduv to stop posting innumerable threads just for one cause.
GOD Bless you all.
I support Sanjay and Chanduv. Need balance in a democracy, so folks we got to walk the fine line in the middle.
more...
copsmart
03-20 07:31 AM
Stop whining and move on with life. There is still a long way to go.
One worthless post!!!
Thank you for your information.I hope you know the situation right now in USA.In jan 2010 H1 people came to Newark Airport were asked to form in a separate queue as soon as they get down from the flight for two levels of interview.Some of them are sent back.Now you can't find employer to transfer your H1 immediately.Before two years it was possible to transfer H1 with out having recent pay stubs and they never asked client letter.Now if you don't have a job you can't transfer your H1 to anybody.
Before Sep 2009 it was two minutes time to take LCA. Now it takes 1 week time to approve LCA. We never heard about Employer-Employee relationship before 2010.
One worthless post!!!
Thank you for your information.I hope you know the situation right now in USA.In jan 2010 H1 people came to Newark Airport were asked to form in a separate queue as soon as they get down from the flight for two levels of interview.Some of them are sent back.Now you can't find employer to transfer your H1 immediately.Before two years it was possible to transfer H1 with out having recent pay stubs and they never asked client letter.Now if you don't have a job you can't transfer your H1 to anybody.
Before Sep 2009 it was two minutes time to take LCA. Now it takes 1 week time to approve LCA. We never heard about Employer-Employee relationship before 2010.
2010 View Al Pacino#39;s Nude Videos
gc_check
01-11 12:41 AM
All,
My employer revoked the i140 of a person after 180 days. He did not reveal this information to me and used labor substitution for me.
The other person used AC21 and got his 485 approved. INS has denied my I140 since a 485 has already been approved and there can be only one GC on one labor. INS says that once the 485 is approved that job ceases to exist.
My company is saying that they have done this in the past and got approvals. They are saying that they applied the I140 substitution long before the 485 approval of the other person.
Now they are saying that they will appeal that the other guy never had the intention of working for the comapany.
Is there any chance for the I140 approval and using the existing labor ? If not will the INS help me keep the Priority Date.
Does anyone have knowledge of such cases (or) know the results of such appeals.
Thanks !
I would suggest, you explore other option and try a join a new employer to process GC rather than looking for options that are uncertain. Although, I feel sorry for your case, it does not sound right to jump lines, while so many people are waiting in line for GC for many many years. There are certain genuine cases in LC Substitution case, but these are very few in numbers, and also it just can't be right when someone just gets ahead of you, while you are waiting for years. It is really good, that LC Substitution is eliminated, so that people like you do no loose the precious time depending on these employers like this and also people who are waiting for years get their chance first. Appealing, etc can be done, but a positive outcome is very very slim in this case, if the original person had worked for this employer for 180 days or more and invoked AC21, then AC21 protects the original beneficiary. If original beneficiary has not worked for this employer at all, then there might be a small chance, but still it is very complicated. As posted here, talk to an attorney other than your employers attorney or yours and get a second opinion and decide accordingly.
My employer revoked the i140 of a person after 180 days. He did not reveal this information to me and used labor substitution for me.
The other person used AC21 and got his 485 approved. INS has denied my I140 since a 485 has already been approved and there can be only one GC on one labor. INS says that once the 485 is approved that job ceases to exist.
My company is saying that they have done this in the past and got approvals. They are saying that they applied the I140 substitution long before the 485 approval of the other person.
Now they are saying that they will appeal that the other guy never had the intention of working for the comapany.
Is there any chance for the I140 approval and using the existing labor ? If not will the INS help me keep the Priority Date.
Does anyone have knowledge of such cases (or) know the results of such appeals.
Thanks !
I would suggest, you explore other option and try a join a new employer to process GC rather than looking for options that are uncertain. Although, I feel sorry for your case, it does not sound right to jump lines, while so many people are waiting in line for GC for many many years. There are certain genuine cases in LC Substitution case, but these are very few in numbers, and also it just can't be right when someone just gets ahead of you, while you are waiting for years. It is really good, that LC Substitution is eliminated, so that people like you do no loose the precious time depending on these employers like this and also people who are waiting for years get their chance first. Appealing, etc can be done, but a positive outcome is very very slim in this case, if the original person had worked for this employer for 180 days or more and invoked AC21, then AC21 protects the original beneficiary. If original beneficiary has not worked for this employer at all, then there might be a small chance, but still it is very complicated. As posted here, talk to an attorney other than your employers attorney or yours and get a second opinion and decide accordingly.
more...
calgirl
09-11 02:41 PM
Why don't you contact some senator! You have been current for so long ..
On July 21st, 2008 my case was transferred to CSC where they are not even processing any 485s. I waited to several years for PD to become current and no sooner did it became current, it was transferred to a black hole. I got different versions from customer service/Io and info pass persons as to where the case is. The reality is that I do not know where my case is right now. The website still shows that it was transferred to CSC.
On July 21st, 2008 my case was transferred to CSC where they are not even processing any 485s. I waited to several years for PD to become current and no sooner did it became current, it was transferred to a black hole. I got different versions from customer service/Io and info pass persons as to where the case is. The reality is that I do not know where my case is right now. The website still shows that it was transferred to CSC.
hair pacino al photo al pacino
pappu
09-19 01:21 PM
Thanks everyone for being patient and supporting us. The work is happening at all ends and it is an uphill task.
We really need to increase our membership. Higher membership will mean us looking tall when we meet lawmakers. Please all try to help us spread the word of IV to everyone you know that is stuck in retrogression. We represent at least half million people but we currently not even have 6 thousand members. Thus we have to bring lot many people into IV. I would encourage everyone to pls. register on this forum instead of being visitors.
Pls try to help us increase our membership in your own capacity, in any way you can. This is something everyone on this forum can help us with.
We really need to increase our membership. Higher membership will mean us looking tall when we meet lawmakers. Please all try to help us spread the word of IV to everyone you know that is stuck in retrogression. We represent at least half million people but we currently not even have 6 thousand members. Thus we have to bring lot many people into IV. I would encourage everyone to pls. register on this forum instead of being visitors.
Pls try to help us increase our membership in your own capacity, in any way you can. This is something everyone on this forum can help us with.
more...
meridiani.planum
03-03 01:51 PM
Thanks for starting this thread. I had completely forgotten about my passport expiring in Jun 2008. I have a question. Is it mandatory to fill name of spouse on the renewal form, if you are married. Let me know.
Thanks
no its not.
Thanks
no its not.
hot Al Pacino Photos, Al Pacino
watzgc
04-02 02:32 PM
Hi zCool,
I got RFE and summary of text is as below.
Asking for
1. Contract from the client in charlotte, nc
(but after applying h1b extn, i moved to CA)
2. W-2 for 2006,2007
I got #2.
for #1, we are planning to send old contract for charlotte,nc client and new contract in CA client.
Do we need to send end client 'project verification letter' or something like that ?.
Thanks a lot.
I got RFE and summary of text is as below.
Asking for
1. Contract from the client in charlotte, nc
(but after applying h1b extn, i moved to CA)
2. W-2 for 2006,2007
I got #2.
for #1, we are planning to send old contract for charlotte,nc client and new contract in CA client.
Do we need to send end client 'project verification letter' or something like that ?.
Thanks a lot.
more...
house Devils Advocate:Al Pacino
The7zen
03-23 11:01 AM
Apr 1st is not the start of a new Fiscal Year. You must be meaning the end of the first financial quarter?
FYI:
Not true, not all companies follow calendar year as their fiscal year....
Ex: MSFT, NWS, etc...
FYI:
Not true, not all companies follow calendar year as their fiscal year....
Ex: MSFT, NWS, etc...
tattoo New Wallpaper of Al Pacino
maheshf
01-25 09:18 AM
Thanks Buran ..this is very helpful. I will lets school know and keep you posted with what they say.
more...
pictures Back To Movies Wallpapers
desitechie
06-18 03:11 PM
I got a letter from my supervisor/manager detailing my experience and duration and got it notarized.
Worked for me.
Worked for me.
dresses Memorabilia from al wallpaper
zj142
07-10 09:25 PM
It would be a smart choice to accept those application, but based on USCIS recent behaviors, I really doubt their decision makers have that intelligence to make such a smart choice.
more...
makeup Al+pacino+scarface+coke
desi485
11-18 06:31 PM
I did not invoke AC21 because of the very same reason. My decision had influence of attorney advise.
I must say Ron Rocks! See his post on his forums thread....
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24864&postcount=8
Hope this will help you to understand this issue further.
I must say Ron Rocks! See his post on his forums thread....
http://immigration-information.com/forums/showpost.php?p=24864&postcount=8
Hope this will help you to understand this issue further.
girlfriend Business al pacino images
glus
10-17 09:31 AM
If you enter on AP, but have a valid H1 extension approval to xx date, and the xx date approaches and you are working for only the original H-1 employer maintaining ALL the conditions of H-1, you can request an extension of H1 status and if all is ok and it will be granted and you will get back on H1B non-immigrant status. But until such time, one is not considered in H1 non-immigrant status but "adjustee of status," which is NOT any non-immigrant status.
Read closely if you did not understand the above.
Read closely if you did not understand the above.
hairstyles Click on the wallpaper to view
pappu
09-19 01:21 PM
Thanks everyone for being patient and supporting us. The work is happening at all ends and it is an uphill task.
We really need to increase our membership. Higher membership will mean us looking tall when we meet lawmakers. Please all try to help us spread the word of IV to everyone you know that is stuck in retrogression. We represent at least half million people but we currently not even have 6 thousand members. Thus we have to bring lot many people into IV. I would encourage everyone to pls. register on this forum instead of being visitors.
Pls try to help us increase our membership in your own capacity, in any way you can. This is something everyone on this forum can help us with.
We really need to increase our membership. Higher membership will mean us looking tall when we meet lawmakers. Please all try to help us spread the word of IV to everyone you know that is stuck in retrogression. We represent at least half million people but we currently not even have 6 thousand members. Thus we have to bring lot many people into IV. I would encourage everyone to pls. register on this forum instead of being visitors.
Pls try to help us increase our membership in your own capacity, in any way you can. This is something everyone on this forum can help us with.
USDream2Dust
04-18 02:19 PM
Isn't it a relief? if the officer calls you for interview, checks your documents and says approved but no GC till PD current? I can live happily with it for couple of years atleast without thinking of GC. The feeling of getting GC in future 100% is almost equal to having GC today. You can change jobs on AC21 without fear and use EAD and AP full force and forget about renewing H1b's
ImmiUser
07-12 11:40 PM
I might had refresh immigration-law and travel.state.gov websites atleast for 100 times in last half an hour just to get glimpse of Aug bulletin :(